Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Coleman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2023cv14166
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Coleman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug Enforcement Administration, U.S. Parole Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Graydon v. Hastings et al
as 2:2013cv00031
Petitioner:
Horace Graydon, Jr.
Respondent:
Suzanne Hastings and U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Veronza Bowers, Jr. v. U.S. Parole Commission, et al
as 12-16560
Petitioner - Appellant:
VERONZA L. BOWERS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and WARDEN
Curtis Watson v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 12-16312
Petitioner - Appellant:
CURTIS LEE WATSON
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Ingham v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 6:2012cv01373
Petitioner:
Robert Ingham
Respondent:
U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lancaster v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 1:2011cv01863
Petitioner:
Roy Michael Lancaster
Respondent:
U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bill Barker v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 10-14266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILL RAY BARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, B.O.P. Director, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, William Sessions, Chairman, DELBERT G. SAURES, B.O.P. Supervisor of D.S.C.C. and others
Walker v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2010cv00638
Petitioner:
Alvin Walker
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Attorney General, State of Florida and U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watson v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 1:2010cv02186
Plaintiff:
Hosea R. Watson
Defendant:
U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walden v. U.S. Parole Commission et al
as 5:2010cv00203
Plaintiff:
Warner L. Walden
Defendant:
U.S. Parole Commission and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
