Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Haley v. Holt et al
as 3:2012cv00775
Petitioner:
William Haley
Respondent:
Ronnie Holt and U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HURT v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 2:2012cv00531
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HURT v. D.C. PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2011cv07457
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
D.C. PAROLE BOARD, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL. OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
AKI v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 2:2011cv05186
Plaintiff:
JAMAAL AKI
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 3:2011cv00993
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Miller
Respondent:
U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BETHEA v. LEVI et al
as 2:2010cv05044
Petitioner:
JAMES E. BETHEA
Respondent:
TROY LEVI, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BROWN v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 2:2009cv02907
Plaintiff:
AMOS BROWN
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGill v. Designation Sentence Computation Center et al
as 1:2008cv01234
Petitioner:
Kevin L. McGill
Respondent:
Designation Sentence Computation Center, Operation Manager - Office, T.R. Sniezek and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ceasar v. Destination Sentence Computation Center Examiner (NUN) et al
as 4:2007cv02201
Petitioner:
Maurice Ceasar
Respondent:
Destination Sentence Computation Center Examiner (NUN), Warden, Albert Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Sneizek et al
as 1:2007cv01621
Petitioner:
Daryl E. Johnson
Respondent:
T.R. Sneizek, Edward Reilly and Chairman U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
