Cases 31 - 40 of 370
Faulkner v. Decker, et al.
as 4:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
William L Faulkner
Defendant:
Leslie Rae Decker, State of Idaho and U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2022cv01609
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hayes, Jeramiah Arnold-Fowlkes and Prince-Amahyza Hudson
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ed Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jane Doe v. City of Baton Rouge, et al
as 22-35572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BATON ROUGE, CITY OF BATON ROUGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES WEBER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
