Cases 51 - 60 of 77
ECKENRODE v. YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION U.S.A. et al
as 2:2012cv00952
Plaintiff:
SKYLER J. ECKENRODE
Defendant:
YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION U.S.A. , YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION OF AMERICA and YAMAHA MOTOR CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
PACHUTA et al v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2012cv00890
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. PACHUTA and SHARON A. PACHUTA
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and ADVANCED EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE CO. OF DELAWARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LONG v. HOME DEPOT, U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2012cv00831
Plaintiff:
SHANDA LONG
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT, U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BEEMAN v. U.S.A. et al
as 1:2011cv00228
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN M. BEEMAN
Defendant:
U.S.A. and JOHN M. KENNEY
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
WEDEL v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2011cv01100
Plaintiff:
JOHN WEDEL
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BAUM et al v. THE BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv00271
Plaintiff:
RANDY BAUM and PATRICIA BAUM
Defendant:
BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC. and HOME DEPOT, U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ZWICK v. U.S.A.
as 2:2010cv01449
Plaintiff:
JAMES RAYMOND ZWICK
Defendant:
U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LYNN et al v. YAMAHA GOLF-CAR COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv01059
Plaintiff:
MERCEDEZ LYNN , MELISSA LYNN and ROBERT LYNN
Defendant:
YAMAHA GOLF-CAR COMPANY , YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION , YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CHEVRON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LLC et al v. KEHM OIL CO.
as 2:2010cv00985
Plaintiff:
CHEVRON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LLC and CHEVRON U.S.A., INC.
Defendant:
KEHM OIL CO.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
