Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00179
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
WRAY et al v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 1:2015cv00530
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Plaintiff:
DONNA PRINCE and JUDITH WRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01486
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MARCHAND et al v. SKECHERS U.S.A., INC.
as 1:2014cv01224
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN MARCHAND and JULIE MARCHAND
Defendant:
SKECHERS U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PARKS et al v. FREUD AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00036
Defendant:
FREUD AMERICA, INC. and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE J. PARKS and RICK M. PARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ST. GREGORY CATHEDRAL SCHOOL et al v. LG ELECTRONICS, INC. et al
as 3:2013mc00004
Plaintiff:
ADK QUARTER MOON, LLC, LEXMI HOSPITALITY, LLC, SHRI BALAJI, LLC and others
Interested Party:
KOCH AIR, LLC
Defendant:
LG ELECTRONICS, INC. and LG ELECTRONICS, U.S.A., INC.
PIERCE v. BLITZ U.S.A. INC.
as 1:2013cv00535
Defendant:
BLITZ U.S.A. INC.
Plaintiff:
MARY JO PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PIERCE v. BLITZ U.S.A. INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01022
Defendant:
BLITZ U.S.A. INC. and WESTERN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
MARY JO PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DAY v. CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
as 1:2010cv01320
Defendant:
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
Plaintiff:
TERRY DAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
ROBBINS v. U.S.A.
as 1:2010cv01071
Petitioner:
VICTOR EUGENE ROBBINS
Respondent:
U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
