Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Kovach-Howarth v. UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust
as 2:2014cv12534
Plaintiff:
Dawn Kovach-Howarth
Defendant:
UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust
James Juracek, et al v. Detroit, City of, et al
as 14-1037
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES A. JURACEK and UAW INTERNATIONAL
Defendant:
DETROIT, CITY OF and DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant - Appellant:
COBO CENTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Holmes v. UAW Local 174 et al
as 2:2013cv11955
Plaintiff:
Harold E Holmes, Jr.
Defendant:
UAW Local 174, Dairn Newsome, John Doe and others
Juracek et al v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2013cv10190
Plaintiff:
James A Juracek and UAW - International
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Detroit Police Department and Cobo Center
Ivy Bailey, et al v. Edward Callaghan, et al
as 12-1803
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IVY BAILEY, CAROLE VETTRUS, KEVIN PSIK and others
Defendant - Appellant:
EDWARD CALLAGHAN, CHRISTINE DERDARIAN and NINO GREEN
Bailey et al v. Callaghan et al
as 2:2012cv11504
Plaintiff:
Ivy Bailey , Carole Vettrus , Kevin Psik and others
Defendant:
Edward Callaghan , Christine Derdarian and Nino Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. General Motors Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv10836
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bell
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation, UAW Local 160 and International Union, UAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Mee Sanders v. United Automobile, Aerospace,, et al
as 09-4335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEE O. SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 12, REGION 2B
Defendant:
RICHARD A. LOTT, Personally and as an agent for UAW Local 12
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
