Cases 11 - 20 of 567
UBS Securities LLC et al v. Dondero et al
as 1:2023cv01965
Defendant:
HIGHLAND CDO HOLDING COMPANY, HIGHLAND FINANCIAL PARTNERS, L.P., HIGHLAND SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES HOLDING COMPANY and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
CLO HOLDCO, LTD
Plaintiff:
UBS Securities, UBS AG London Branch and UBS Securities LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ri Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Starostenko v. UBS AG (A Swiss Bank)
as 23-20
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yuri Starostenko, Irina Tsareva-Starostenko and Irina ---- Tsareva-Starostenko
Defendant / Appellee:
UBS AG, (A Swiss Bank) and UBS (Bahamas) LTD, (In voluntary liquidation)
Zaerpour et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Soheil Zaerpour and The People of the United States of America
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Bank plc and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
UBS Group AG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McClain et al v. Pence et al
as 1:2022cv23738
Defendant:
Charles Terrance Canady, Michael Richard Pence doing business as U.S.A. Inc., Gary Gensler Agency Chairman doing business as US Securities Exchange Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Terence M. McClain, Linda N. McClain, Edward G. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Zaerpour v. UBS Group AG et al
as 1:2022cv07232
Plaintiff:
Scheil Zaerpour and Soheil Zaerpour
Defendant:
UBS Group AG, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Treasury Securities Auc
as 22-943
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Marc Federighi, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael St. John, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System, On behalf of itself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
BMO Capital Markets Corp., CIBC World Markets Corp., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and others
City of Providence, Rhode v. Bats Global Markets, Inc.
as 22-920
Plaintiff:
Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, Forsta AP-fonden, StateBoston Retirement System and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Providence, Rhode Island, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Employees' Retirement System of the Government of the Virgin Islands, United Association National Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Wedbush Securities, Inc., Tradework Inc., Bids Trading, L.P. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., Direct Edge ECN, L.L.C., The Nasdaq Stock Market L.L.C. and others
Nypl v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 22-698
Petitioner:
Lisa McCarthy, an individual, Mad Travel, Inc., AKA Travel Leaders, Valarie Jolly, an individual and others
Respondent:
Bank of America, N.A., JP Morgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corporation and others
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
