Cases 1 - 10 of 18
SL-X Trading Europe Limited v. Bank Of America Corporation
as 21-2699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SL-x Technology USA LLC, SL-x Trading Europe Ltd., SL-x Technology UK Ltd. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp., Merrill Lynch L.P. Holdings, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing, L.P. and others
SL-X IP S.A.R.L. v. Bank Of America Corporation
as 21-2697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SL-X IP S.A.R.L., SL-x Technology USA LLC, SL-x Trading Europe Ltd. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Merrill Lynch L.P. Holdings, Inc., Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp. and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Credit Suisse Group AG, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and others
SL-X Trading Europe Limited, et al v. Bank Of America Corporation, et al
as 1:2019cv04885
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Strategic Securities Lending Corp., Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC, EquiLend Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SL-x Trading USA LLC, SL-x Technology UK Ltd., SL-x Trading Europe Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
SL-X IP S.A.R.L. v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv10179
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Strategic Securities Lending Corp., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
SL-X S.A.R.L. and SL-X IP S.A.R.L.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv06221
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Strategic Securities Lending Corp., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System, Orange County Employees Retirement System, Sonoma County Employees' Retirement Association and others
Interested Party:
Schonfeld Strategic Advisors LLC and Two Sigma Investments, LP
Petitioner:
SL-X IP S.A.R.L., SL-x Trading Europe Ltd., SL-x Technology UK Ltd. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Deutsche Bank AG and Joseph Santoro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
United Food & Comm. Workers v. Chesapeake Energy, et al
as 13-6165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOCAL 880 UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, Retail Food Employers Pension Fund
Defendant - Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION, AUBREY K. MCCLENDON, MARCUS C. ROWLAND and others
Defendant:
UBS INVESTMENT BANK, ABN AMRO, BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES LLC and others
Miller et al v. Eksportfinans A.S.A. et al
as 1:2010cv05336
Plaintiff:
Leona J. Miller and Leona J. Miller Revocable Trust
Defendant:
Eksportfinans A.S.A., Bank of America Securities Limited, Merril Lynch & Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
United Food and Commercial Workers Union et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 5:2009cv01114
Plaintiff:
Local 880 United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 880 United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Safron Capital Corporation and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Energy Corporation and others
Movant:
Local 103 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and Michael Deutsch
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Safron Capital Corporation et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv01826
Plaintiff:
Safron Capital Corporation, Safron Capital Corporation, Safron Capital Corporation and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Aubrey K. McClendon, Marcus C. Rowland and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Foy et al v. Vanderbilt Capital Advisors, LLC et al
as 6:2009cv00178
Defendant:
Vanderbilt Capital Advisors, LLC, Vanderbilt Financial, LLC, Vanderbilt Financial Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Frank C Foy and Suzanne B Foy
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
