Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ramin M. Roohipour, M.D., Inc. et al v. UMR, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv08006
Plaintiff:
Ramin M. Roohipour, M.D., Inc., R&R Surgical Institute, an Unincorporated association and R and R Surgical Institute
Defendant:
UMR, Inc., PCL Construction Enterprises,Inc, Multiplan Audit & Review Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Contract Dispute
County of San Bernardino v. United Health Group Incorporated et al
as 5:2021cv00595
Defendant:
UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., Mathis Bros., Oklahoma City, LLC, Unitedhealthcare Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
County of San Bernardino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathis Bros., Oklahoma City, LLC et al v. United Health Group Incorporated et al
as 5:2021cv00594
Defendant:
Las Vegas Sands Corp., OPTUM SERVICES INC., Unitedhealthcare Insurance Company and others
Petitioner:
Mathis Bros., Oklahoma City, LLC
Plaintiff:
County of San Bernardino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
A New Start Treatment and Recovery Center, LLC v. UMR, Inc.
as 2:2020cv09245
Plaintiff:
A New Start Treatment and Recovery Center, LLC a California Limited Liability Company doing business as Muse Treatment
Defendant:
UMR, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dang v. Pontier et al
as 3:2019cv01519
Defendant:
UMR Inc., TEOCO Corporation Group Benefit Plan, David Pontier and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dang and Joseph Dang an individual doing business as Law Office of Joseph Dang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Dang v Pontier et al
as 3:2018cv01869
Defendant:
Smoke Ranch Surgery Center, LLC, CFA, LLC, UMR Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dang and Joseph Dang an individual doing business as Law Office of Joseph Dang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Perez v. TransitAmerica Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00489
Defendant:
TransitAmerica Services, Inc., UMR, Inc. and Railway Claims Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kerry Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
