Cases 1 - 10 of 11
HERRING v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
JAMES HERRING
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER CHARLIE WARD, WARDEN BERRY, WARDEN PERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILLIS v. SMITH et al
as 5:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
FRANK GILLIS
Defendant:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH, UNIT MANAGER MCKELLOR, DOCTOR KENNETH COWENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Cox et al
as 6:2021cv00086
Plaintiff:
Rodney M. Lane and Rodney Manyon Lane
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Cox, Unit Manager Martin, Unit Manager Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERKINS v. CALDWELL et al
as 3:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Antonio Caldwell, Fairview Park Hospital, Security Oliver and others
Plaintiff:
Sherwin S. Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERKINS v. PRIMUS et al
as 5:2020cv00350
Defendant:
CHIEF COUNSELOR BRAGG, OFFICER JONES, PHYSICAL THERAPIST RON PRIMUS and others
Plaintiff:
SHERWIM PERKINS and SHERWIN PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00238
Defendant:
INVESTIGATOR JAMES D SMITH, SERGEANT WHITEHEAD, WARDEN KEVIN SPRAYBERRY and others
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MALIK BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. ALLEN et al
as 6:2019cv00011
Plaintiff:
EARNEST CLAYTON
Defendant:
Marty Allen, Kearins, HYANNA BRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. JOHNSON et al
as 7:2019cv00019
Defendant:
Commissioner HOMER BRYSON, Capt KRAKE, Capt JAVAKA JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. ALLEN et al
as 7:2019cv00006
Plaintiff:
EARNEST CLAYTON
Defendant:
MARTY ALLEN, KEARINS, HYANNA BRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHISUM v. BEAVERS et al
as 5:2018cv00414
Defendant:
ASSISTANT WARDEN ADAMS, MAURICE BEAVERS, WARDEN MARTY ALLEN and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE QUINTAVIOUS CHISUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
