Cases 31 - 40 of 151
MESA v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 2:2022cv07369
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MESA
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC. and ABC COMPANIES, INC. 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SCHLAFFER et al v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01997
Plaintiff:
FRED SCHLAFFER and DEENA SCHLAFFER
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK & NEW JERSEY, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
ARANDS v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01715
Plaintiff:
LUZ STELLA ARANDS
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPS. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ARANDS v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv01715
Plaintiff:
LUZ STELLA ARANDS
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPS. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ARANDS v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01715
Plaintiff:
LUZ STELLA ARANDS
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPS. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
JOSEPH v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 2:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOSEPH
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., ABC CORP. 1-10 and FLIGHT ATTENDA 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
