Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
MML INVESTORS SERVICES, LLC v. TRINITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF INDIANA
as 2:2022cv01333
Plaintiff:
MML INVESTORS SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
TRINITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
CASTON v. CITY OF NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2021cv03827
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CASTON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEPHEN SCHWARZMAN, JONATHAN GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lash v. Corbetts et al
as 1:2018cv02306
Defendant:
Tom Corbetts, Chancellor Woodson, Doctor Tan and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Lash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WOOD v. WOOD et al
as 2:2016cv00995
Plaintiff:
TARA THOMFORDE WOOD
Defendant:
DAVID WOOD , WILBERT A. STINESPRING and THE WEST VIRGINIA CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. WISSINOMING UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
as 2:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
WISSINOMING UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. WISSINOMING UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
as 2:2012cv04691
Plaintiff:
CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
WISSINOMING UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
GRAY et al v. DARBY et al
as 5:2008cv02527
Plaintiff:
SEAN GRAY and STEPHANIE GRAY
Defendant:
GEORGE E. DARBY, EASTERN PA CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, SOUTHWEST DISTRICT OF THE EASTERN PA CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
