Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
McDowell v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv04028
Plaintiff: William McDowell
Defendant: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. d/b/a UPS; UNITED PARCEL SERVICE CO.; UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, United Parcel Service, Inc. doing business as UPS, United Parcel Service Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1073
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00125
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00029
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2011cv02733
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James et al v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv00153
Plaintiff: Katy Lu James and Jay W. Keller
Defendant: United Parcel Service of America, Inc., United Parcel Service of America, Inc. and Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Neff v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00039
Plaintiff: Kimberly M. Neff
Defendant: United Parcel Service of America, Inc. and Broadspire Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Neff v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00328
Plaintiff: Kimberly M. Neff
Defendant: United Parcel Service of America, Inc. and Broadspire Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?