Cases 21 - 30 of 155
Citizens for A Healthy Community et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 1:2021cv01268
Plaintiff:
WildEarth Guardians, Wilderness Workshop, High Country Conservation Advocates and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, United States Forest Service, United States Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4231 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Rocky Mountain Wild v. United States BLM, et al
as 21-1071
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, a federal agency and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, a federal agency
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, INC., a Colorado non-profit corporation
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al
as 2:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance and Wilderness Society, The
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Department of the Interior and United States Bureau of Land Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Western Energy Alliance v. Biden et al
as 2:2021cv00013
Respondent:
United States of America President, United States Acting Secretary of Interior, Scott De La Vega and others
Petitioner:
Western Energy Alliance, Petroleum Association of Wyoming and State of Wyoming
Intervenor:
Conservation Colorado, Western Colorado Alliance, Western Watersheds Project and others
Amicus Curiae:
Western Leaders Network
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Colorado v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al
as 1:2021cv00129
Defendant:
David Bernhardt, William Pendley, United States Bureau of Land Management and others
Plaintiff:
State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Wyoming, et al v. DOI, et al
as 20-8073
Intervenor:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EARTHWORKS, STATE OF NEW MEXICO and others
Respondent:
WESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, MICHAEL D. NEDD, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Petitioner:
STATE OF WYOMING, STATE OF MONTANA, INDEPENDANT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
State of Wyoming, et al v. DOI, et al
as 20-8072
Intervenor:
SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as United States Department of Interior Secretary, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Petitioner:
STATE OF WYOMING, STATE OF MONTANA, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Wyo-Ben Inc. v. Bernhardt, et al
as 20-8065
Petitioner / Appellant:
WYO-BEN INC., a Montana corporation
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID BERNHARDT, an individual, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and WILLIAM PERRY PENDLEY, an individual, in his capacity as Acting Director of the United States Bureau of Land Management
WildEarth Guardians v. Haaland, et al
as 20-2146
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID LONGLY BERNHARDT, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, DAVID LONGLY BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of the Interior and others
Friends of the Floridas et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al.
as 2:2020cv00924
Plaintiff:
New Mexico Wilderness Alliance, Gila Resources Information Project, WildEarth Guardians and others
Defendant:
William Childress, United States Bureau of Land Management and David Wallace
Not Classified By Court:
US Attorney General and Civil Process Clerk of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
