Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ibrihim v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2023cv02509
Petitioner:
Siraj Ibrihim and Robert Crain
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons and John Doe of United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02443
Petitioner:
Jermaine Hill
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers and United State Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ibrihim v. Settles et al
as 2:2022cv02847
Plaintiff:
Siraj Ibrihim and Robert Crain
Defendant:
Dewun Settles, Warden Shelby County Corrections, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2022cv00266
Petitioner:
Mark Norris
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anderson v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv02417
Plaintiff:
Antonio Anderson
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshal Service, Bennett Echols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ibrihim v. Director/Warden Shelby County Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv02221
Plaintiff:
Siraj Ibrihim and Robert Crain
Defendant:
Director/Warden Shelby County Corrections, Warden Federal Medical Center Butner, NC, Janika White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yarbrough v. Jackson et al
as 2:2018cv02443
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons, United States District Court, Warden Jackson and others
Petitioner:
Anton Yarbrough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anderson v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2008cv02142
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Anderson
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, UNICOR, Mr. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
