Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Timothy Young v. DOJ
as 20-1558
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY D. YOUNG
Baine v Barr et al
as 1:2019cv04950
Defendant:
Brendan Kelly, Attorney General William Barr, US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Baine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adam Delgado v. Merit Systems Protection Board
as 19-2239
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Petitioner:
ADAM DELGADO
National Immigrant Justice Cen v. DOJ
as 19-2088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CENTER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Armbruster et al
as 2:2019cv00481
Defendant:
Bret Naggs, Mark Wogsland and Peter Armbruster
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Intervenor:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
William Grant, II v. DOD, et al
as 19-1485
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, GREGORY K. HARRIS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Rick Leslie v. Indiana State Police Departmen, et al
as 19-1433
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LAFAYETTE INDIANA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICK LESLIE
Jerry Hendricks v. DOJ
as 19-1196
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY L. HENDRICKS
Jerry Hendricks v. DOJ
as 19-1083
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY L. HENDRICKS
Lyon v. Canadian National Railway Company et al
as 1:2019cv00198
Plaintiff:
LeFloris Lyon
Defendant:
Tim Sanford, Charles H Russell, Shelley Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
