Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Brindell et al v. Carlisle Industrial Brake and Friction Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01075
Plaintiff:
John Brindell, Sr., Connie Dupay, Carolyn Brindell and others
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corp., Strick Trailers LLC, Meritor Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States Fidelity v. Cobian-Gonzalez, et al
as 13-1537
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY CO.,
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL COBIAN-GUZMAN and TATIANA COBIAN-GONZALEZ
Interested Party:
GUILLERMO A. NIGAGLIONI-BERRIOS
United States Fidelity v. Cobian-Guzman, et al
as 13-1536
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY CO.,
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL COBIAN-GUZMAN and TATIANA COBIAN-GONZALEZ
Interested Party:
GUILLERMO A. NIGAGLIONI-BERRIOS
Trotsky v. The Travelers Indemnity Company et al
as 2:2011cv02144
Plaintiff:
Herman J Trotsky
Defendant:
The Travelers Indemnity Company and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.
Counter_claimant:
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. and The Travelers Indemnity Company
Counter_defendant:
Herman J Trotsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
US Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Arch Insurance, et al
as 09-2561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY CO.,
Defendant:
EASTERN CONTRACTORS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY
U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Challenge Construction, Corp., et al
as 09-2572
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY CO.,
Defendant - Appellant:
CHALLENGE CONSTRUCTION, CORP., ROBERTO TORRES-GONZALEZ, EUGENIO RODRIGUEZ-LUCIANO and others
Defendant:
CARMEN ORAMA-LOPEZ and CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP, Torres-Orama
US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Arch Insurance Co.
as 08-1709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY CO.,
Defendant - Appellee:
ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
EASTERN CONTRACTORS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
