Cases 21 - 30 of 75
Donald Trump v. Committee on Ways and Means,, et al
as 19-5360
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Donald J. Trump
Defendant / Appellee:
Letitia James, in her official capacity as Attorney General of New York State and Michael R. Schmidt, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance
Defendant / Appellant:
Richard E. Neal, in his official capacity as Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Andrew Grossman, in his official capacity as Chief Tax Counsel of the House Ways and Means Committee and Committee on Ways and Means, United States House of Representatives
In re: Frederick H. Banks
as 19-3896
Respondent:
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Committee on the Judiciary v. Donald McGahn, II
as 19-5331
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives
Defendant / Appellant:
Donald F. McGahn, II
Amicus Curiae:
J. W. Verret, Associate Professor of Law, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School, Jim Leach, U.S. House of Representatives (R-Iowa), 1977-2007, Bob Inglis, U.S. House of Representatives (R-South Carolina), 1993-1999, 2005 2011 and others
COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv03557
Defendant:
WILBUR L. ROSS, JR. and WILLIAM P. BARR
Plaintiff:
COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
App. Cmte. of the JudiciaryIn re: App. Cmte. of the Judiciary
as 19-5288
Not Yet Classified:
United States House of Representatives, United States Department of Justice and Committee on the Judiciary
In Re:
In re: Application of the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House Of Representatives, for an Order Authorizing the Release of Certain Grand Jury Materials
KUPPERMAN v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE U.S.A. et al
as 1:2019cv03224
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M KUPPERMAN and CHARLES M. KUPPERMAN
Defendant:
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE U.S.A., CAROLYN B. MALONEY, NANCY PELOSI and others
Petitioner:
CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Mike Redford v. Members of the United States, et al
as 19-5280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mike Redford, Pre-Eminent Jurist, Dr., LL.M, ISD/PhD
Defendant / Appellee:
Members of the United States Senate, Members of the United States House of Representatives, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
We the People v. United States Supreme Court et al
as 2:2019mc00174
Plaintiff:
We the People
Defendant:
United States House of Representatives, United States Senate, United States Federal Judiciary and others
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2019cv07777
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Interested Party:
National Council on Independent Living, Center for Public Representation, Autistic Self Advocacy Network and others
Amicus Curiae:
Congressional Tri-Caucus, The National Asian Pacific Center on Aging, American Medical Association and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
In re: Application of the Committee
as 19-5219
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Andrew Christenson
Not Yet Classified:
United States House of Representatives and Committee on the Judiciary
Respondent / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
In Re:
In re: Application of the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House Of Representatives, for an Order Authorizing the Release of Certain Grand Jury Materials
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
