Cases 21 - 30 of 76
COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
as 1:2019cv01974
Plaintiff:
COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, CHARLES P. RETTIG, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant:
DTTM OPERATIONS MANAGING MEMBER CORP., DONALD J. TRUMP REVOCABLE TRUST, DJT HOLDINGS LLC and others
Petitioner:
DUANE MORLEY COX
Amicus Curiae:
THOMAS J. SPULAK, GERALDINE R. GENNET, IRVIN B. NATHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Jean Crump v. SSA, et al
as 20-55727
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEAN CRUMP
Defendant / Appellee:
MITCH MCCONNELL, President of The United State Senate, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, DOES, 1-200 and others
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2019cv07777
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Interested Party:
National Council on Independent Living, Center for Public Representation, Autistic Self Advocacy Network and others
Amicus Curiae:
Congressional Tri-Caucus, The National Asian Pacific Center on Aging, American Medical Association and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Committee on the Judiciary v. Donald McGahn, II
as 19-5331
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives
Defendant / Appellant:
Donald F. McGahn, II
Amicus Curiae:
J. W. Verret, Associate Professor of Law, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School, Jim Leach, U.S. House of Representatives (R-Iowa), 1977-2007, Bob Inglis, U.S. House of Representatives (R-South Carolina), 1993-1999, 2005 2011 and others
COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv03557
Defendant:
WILBUR L. ROSS, JR. and WILLIAM P. BARR
Plaintiff:
COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donald Trump v. Committee on Ways and Means,, et al
as 19-5360
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Donald J. Trump
Defendant / Appellee:
Letitia James, in her official capacity as Attorney General of New York State and Michael R. Schmidt, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance
Defendant / Appellant:
Richard E. Neal, in his official capacity as Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Andrew Grossman, in his official capacity as Chief Tax Counsel of the House Ways and Means Committee and Committee on Ways and Means, United States House of Representatives
Frederick BanksIn re: Frederick Banks
as 20-1009
Respondent:
HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, JUDGE PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN, MICHAEL J MACHEN and others
Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK H. BANKS
KUPPERMAN v. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE U.S.A. et al
as 1:2019cv03224
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M KUPPERMAN and CHARLES M. KUPPERMAN
Defendant:
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE U.S.A., CAROLYN B. MALONEY, NANCY PELOSI and others
Petitioner:
CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
In re: Frederick H. Banks
as 19-3896
Respondent:
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
App. Cmte. of the JudiciaryIn re: App. Cmte. of the Judiciary
as 19-5288
Not Yet Classified:
United States House of Representatives, United States Department of Justice and Committee on the Judiciary
In Re:
In re: Application of the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House Of Representatives, for an Order Authorizing the Release of Certain Grand Jury Materials
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
