Cases 1 - 10 of 16
APANAVICIUS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
DREW APANAVICIUS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 mv Federal Tort Claims Act - Motor Vehicle
William White v. DOJ, et al
as 21-1229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Robert Kowalski v. USMS, et al
as 20-3511
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT M. KOWALSKI
Robert Kowalski v. USMS, et al
as 20-3482
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Petitioner:
ROBERT M. KOWALSKI
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Passport Agency, et al
as 20-2429
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM S. DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Melvin Bell v. USMS, et al
as 20-1580
Petitioner / Appellant:
MELVIN T. BELL
Respondent / Appellee:
R. A. HEISNER and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Melvin Bell v. USMS, et al
as 20-8008
Respondent:
R. A. HEISNER and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Petitioner:
MELVIN T. BELL
Lyon v. Canadian National Railway Company et al
as 1:2019cv00198
Plaintiff:
LeFloris Lyon
Defendant:
Tim Sanford, Charles H Russell, Shelley Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2019cv00188
Plaintiff:
LeFloris Lyon
Defendant:
TIM SANFORD, SHELLEY BOONE, UNITED STATES MARSHALL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
William J. Mabie v. USMS
as 18-2580
Petitioner:
WILLIAM J. MABIE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
