Cases 1 - 9 of 9
McMillan v. United States Department of Justice
as 2:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Peter A McMillan
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, United States Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howarth v. United States Marshal Service
as 2:2021cv02054
Plaintiff:
Robert Howarth
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins et al v. Osborn et al
as 2:2019cv03478
Plaintiff:
Unknown Party and Barbara Hopkins
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration, Kevin Manning, John D Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrison v. Texas, State of et al
as 2:2014cv02372
Plaintiff:
John Robert Morrison
Defendant:
Texas, State of, Arizona, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards v. Bolton et al
as 2:2013cv02244
Plaintiff:
Stephen S Edwards
Defendant:
Susan R Bolton and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matsumoto v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 2:2010cv00639
Plaintiff:
Honey Murleen Matsumoto
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, United States Department of Justice and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fishman v. United States Marshall Service
as 2:2008cv00308
Plaintiff:
Stanley Fishman
Defendant:
United States Marshall Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller et al v. United States Marshal's Service et al
as 2:2007cv02141
Plaintiff:
Delbert Miller, Colleen Miller and Jared Miller
Defendant:
United States Marshal's Service, Ian Jarvice, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
