Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ahmed v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service et al
as 1:2023cv03261
Plaintiff:
Oluwashina Ahmed
Defendant:
United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Nigeria Embassy in the United States of America, United States Marshals Service and others
Wearing v. Robert A. Deyton Detention et al
as 1:2022cv03497
Plaintiff:
Rashad Andre Wearing
Defendant:
Robert A. Deyton Detention, GEO Group Incorporated, Warden Charles Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Rau v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv05200
Defendant:
Clark Millsap, Corporal. [FNU] Crutchfield, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Cheri Rau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 1:2017cv01861
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes, United States Marshals Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Goodman v. The Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility et al
as 1:2015cv01724
Plaintiff:
Tony Goodman
Defendant:
The Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility, The G.E.D. Group Inc., R. Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. The Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility et al
as 1:2015cv01468
Plaintiff:
Tony Goodman
Defendant:
The Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility, G.E.O. Group Inc., R. Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States Marshal Service
as 1:2011cv02356
Plaintiff:
Franklin L. Williams
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
