Cases 1 - 10 of 15
STOLL v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
DERONDA D. STOLL
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
MONIER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv01413
Plaintiff:
GLORIA MONIER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE(S)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BANKS v. WALKER et al
as 2:2018cv01565
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SANCHEZ v. LYNCH et al
as 3:2017cv00215
Petitioner:
FERNANDO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. COCAS et al
as 2:2017mc00673
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DONOVAN COCAS, ADRIAN N. ROE, MCKEE and others
SANCHEZ v. LYNCH et al
as 3:2016cv00226
Petitioner:
FERNANDO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
UNITED TRIBES OF AMERICA et al v. MCKEESPORT POST OFFICE et al
as 2:2016mc00972
Plaintiff:
UNITED TRIBES OF AMERICA and NOON BEAR
Defendant:
MCKEESPORT POST OFFICE, SENTENCING DESIGNATION AND COMPUTATION CENTER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS and others
BANKS v. HORNAK et al
as 2:2016mc00079
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
MARK HORNAK, ORLANDO HARPER, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. WIETZMAN et al
as 2:2016mc00058
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
MARK G. WIETZMAN, DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD US DEPT OF JUSTICE and others
BANKS v. HICKTON et al
as 2:2015mc00885
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
DAVID HICKTON, ROBERT CESSAR, JUDGE MARK HORNAK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
