Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Ellis v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv01255
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Ellis
Defendant:
United States of America, Evertt Cottrell, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Davila v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Davila
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, Rex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Andrew v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv05624
Plaintiff:
Norvell Andrew
Defendant:
United States of America, Andrew Ciolli, Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleming v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv05082
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Fleming
Defendant:
United States of America, Warden Erica Strong, Warden T. Jusino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hornbeck v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv06309
Plaintiff:
Terry R. Hornbeck
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. United States of America et al
as 3:2019cv04214
Defendant:
Mr. Heldman, Mr. Robinson, Mr. Dunwoody and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Willis v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00761
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Kentrell Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Hitler v. United States of America et al
as 3:2019cv01817
Plaintiff:
Carl A.R. Hitler, Jr. and Carl Renowitzky
Defendant:
California Psychiatric Transitions and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cuevas v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv02439
Plaintiff:
Alexander John Cuevas
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travis v. United States Of America
as 5:2016cv03457
Petitioner:
Robby Travis
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
