Cases 31 - 40 of 270
Robinson v. United States of America et al.
as 3:2021cv00193
Plaintiff:
Anthony Robinson
Defendant:
United States of America, S. Harjl, G.A. Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Richard v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00479
Plaintiff:
Naarl Joseph Richard
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Smith v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00291
Plaintiff:
Michael Devell Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Silva v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv00267
Defendant:
Warden Steven Reiser and United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Tomas Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boatwright v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv00245
Plaintiff:
Larry Boatwright
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
United States of America and Warden Steven Riser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Whaley v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00233
Plaintiff:
Gerald Decosta Whaley and Costa
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Turner v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00217
Plaintiff:
Antonio Turner
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gordon v. Withers et al
as 3:2021cv00160
Plaintiff:
Micah Gordon and Micah Gordon-Bey
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden SD Withers and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smothers v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Rodney Smothers
Defendant:
Edward O. Pearson United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Quinn v. Withers et al
as 3:2021cv00135
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Quinn
Defendant:
Warden SD Withers and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
