Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Snell v. Oglesby
as 4:2010cv04095
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Snell
Defendant:
Government of the United States of America, Western District of Arkansas, The, Bi-State/Bowie County Correctional Center, Community Education Centers Correctional and Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Judd v. United States of America
as 5:2010cv05075
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hall v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv04095
Petitioner:
Lemuel R. Hall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Poulton v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv04069
Petitioner:
Laif Douglas Poulton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. United States of America
as 6:2009cv06032
Petitioner:
Henry Tonje Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Poulton v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv04030
Plaintiff:
Laif Douglas Poulton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. Pate et al
as 6:2008cv06084
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Edwin Pate
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Madden v. Norris et al
as 5:2008cv05180
Plaintiff:
Lee Madden
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Mike Beebe, Arkansas Board of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Demos v. United States of America
as 6:2008cv06055
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. Manfre
as 2:2008cv02010
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kevin Manfre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
