Cases 1 - 10 of 130
Davila v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024ct03092
Plaintiff:
Noel Davila
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bright v. United States of America
as 5:2024ct03003
Plaintiff:
William S. Bright
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Contreras v. United States of America
as 5:2023ct03342
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Contreras
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Thompson v. United States of America
as 5:2023ct03291
Plaintiff:
Brandon E. Thompson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McCormick v. United States of America
as 5:2023ct03292
Plaintiff:
Markus Odon McCormick
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nestor v. United States of America
as 5:2023ct03218
Plaintiff:
Brian Lee Nestor
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Cody v. United States of America
as 5:2023ct03127
Plaintiff:
Talmadge Cody
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Pearce v. United States of America
as 5:2023ct03060
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J. Pearce
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waters v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023ct03044
Plaintiff:
Dakota Waters
Defendant:
United States of America, Dr. J. Halbsgut, Ms. James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Conner v. Esquetini et al
as 5:2022ct03436
Plaintiff:
Terry Conner
Defendant:
Physician Assistant Esquetini, Unknown Medical Staff and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
