Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Muhammad et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Kariem Qaadir Muhammad, Jamual Famin Muhammad, Danny Dermill Daniels and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Denver, City of and Aurora, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00122
Petitioner:
Brendan Tyler Moore
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cavanaugh v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00152
Petitioner:
Paul Henry Cavanaugh
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Prasad v. Henson et al
as 3:2021cv00083
Plaintiff:
Krishil S. Prasad
Respondent:
John D. Henson, Dustin B. Kouba, Amanda S. Rockers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Caron v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00026
Petitioner:
Kelli Lynn Caron
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sarnor v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv00227
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Zwannah Ahamadu Sarnor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00194
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Owen Cordell Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Spotted Bear v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00002
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Lonnie Dale Spotted Bear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Knowles v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv00260
Defendant:
Burleig Morton Detention Center, Bismarck PD/Police Department's, Other Agencies and others
Plaintiff:
Efrain Reyes Knowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knowles v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00250
Plaintiff:
Efrain Reyes Knowles
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
