Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Watson v. United States Parole Commission et al.
as 5:2012cv00546
Petitioner:
Curtis Lee Watson
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Platshorn v. United States of America, et al
as 9:2012cv80643
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Platshorn
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission, Chairman of the United States Parole Commission, Probation Officer of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv02160
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TRADER v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2010cv03690
Petitioner:
Ossie Robert Trader
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv21682
Petitioner:
Andrew J. Smith
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Parole Commission and Linda McGrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Veronza Bowers, Jr. v. Loren Grayer
as 10-12170
Petitioner - Appellant:
VERONZA L. BOWERS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
LOREN A. GRAYER, Warden and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Dennis v. Haynes et al
as 2:2010cv00070
Petitioner:
Lonnie Dennis
Respondent:
Anthony Haynes, United States Bureau of Prisons and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. United States Parole Commission
as 1:2009cv23429
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lynn Davis
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
