Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Warren v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 2:2022cv01584
Plaintiff:
Gary Ronald Warren
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission and United States Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andreozzi v. United States Parole Commission
as 2:2016cv00669
Petitioner:
Armand Andreozzi
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Friedlander v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 4:2015cv00453
Petitioner:
John F Friedlander
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and Susan G McClintock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. United States Parole Commission
as 2:2015cv00188
Petitioner:
Michael Scott Johnson
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Medrano v. United States Parole Commission
as 4:2014cv02294
Petitioner:
Jaime B Medrano
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mahsill v. Clay et al
as 4:2013cv01000
Petitioner:
Devere Mahsill
Respondent:
B Clay and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hill v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 4:2013cv00704
Plaintiff:
Gary D Hill
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission and Isaac Fulwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bracy v. Clay et al
as 4:2013cv00128
Petitioner:
Boyer A Bracy
Respondent:
Becky Clay and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brigden v. United States Parole Commission
as 4:2012cv00716
Petitioner:
Scott David Brigden
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Poindexter v. Apker
as 4:2011cv00123
Petitioner:
Joseph Edward Poindexter
Respondent:
Craig Apker, United States Parole Commission, Lee Satterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
