Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 181
MATHIS et al v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2024cv01312
Plaintiff: W. MATHIS and K. DAVIS
Defendant: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02607
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02182
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JONES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2022cv01815
Petitioner: THOMAS R. JONES
Defendant: PAROLE COMMISSION
Respondent: JONES MICHELE and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01560
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
ARRINGTON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2021cv00261
Defendant: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff: DERREK E. ARRINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWMAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv03761
Plaintiff: JOHN NEWMAN
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02897
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
PARKS v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2020cv01481
Defendant: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff: DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
MABRY v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2020cv00868
Defendant: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff: FRANK MABRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?