Cases 71 - 80 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Yoachum v. United States et. al
as 4:2008cv00217
Plaintiff:
Gary Yoachum
Defendant:
United States and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Robles v. Buckingham
as 4:2008cv00187
Plaintiff:
Minerva Policroniades Robles and Rogelio S. Robles
Defendant:
Marion Joanne Buckingham, John Doe Buckingham and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
United States Postal Service v. American Postal Workers Union
as 4:2007cv00613
Plaintiff:
United States Postal Service
Defendant:
American Postal Workers Union
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Petty-Sandoval, et al v. Peltz, et al
as 2:2007cv01955
Plaintiff:
Shari M Petty-Sandoval, Jasmine Petty, Andriana Martinez and others
Defendant:
Jeffrey Joe Peltz, Jane Doe Peltz, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Walker v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2007cv01566
Plaintiff:
Jamel Walker
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and John E. Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
McDermott v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2007cv00643
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Greg Baker and S Black
Plaintiff:
James R. McDermott
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
