Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012mc02307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harrelson v. United States of America et al (CONSENT)
as 3:2011cv00827
Plaintiff:
Dinah Kaye Harrelson
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011mc03261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv02153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lynch v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2011cv01356
Plaintiff:
June D Lynch
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Patrick R Donahoe, Morgan Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, City of et al v. United States Postal Service, The
as 7:2011cv00585
Plaintiff:
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, City of , Walter Maddox and Kip Tyner
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, The
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 0409
Williams v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2010cv03559
Plaintiff:
Thresa Lynn Williams
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Darris v. United States Postal Service Office of Inspector General
as 2:2010mc03512
Petitioner:
Ashley Curtis Darris
Respondent:
United States Postal Service Office of Inspector General
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2010cv01098
Plaintiff:
Martricia Chapman
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and John Potter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
