Cases 31 - 40 of 205
Robert Bailey v. William Toman, Jr.
as 13-7628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY, K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Bailey v. NC Dept of Motor Vehicle
as 13-7621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Vehicles License and Theft Division, JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Robert Bailey v. William Toman, Jr.
as 13-7616
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY, K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Bailey v. NC Dept. of Motor Vehicle
as 13-7622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, License and Theft Division, JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Robert Bailey v. Unknown Female Officer
as 13-7617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN FEMALE OFFICER, C. C. BLAKE, JOSEPH GARDNER and others
Robert Bailey v. William Toman, Jr.
as 13-7586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY, K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Bailey v. William Toman, Jr.
as 13-7520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY, P. J. GRAHAM and others
Robert Bailey v. William Toman, Jr.
as 13-7465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY, K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Bailey v. William Toman, Jr.
as 13-7463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY, K. D. MACKEY and others
Robert Bailey v. William Toman, Jr.
as 13-7466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY, K. D. MACKEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
