Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kenyon v. Guiteriez et al
as 4:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kenyon
Defendant:
Dr. Julian Guiteriez, Dr. Shaihk Arif, Patricia Comer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAWKINS v. OLIVER et al
as 1:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE HAWKINS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT OLIVER, SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER, MS. SENZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KITTRELL v. SMITH et al
as 2:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
ANDRE KITTRELL
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, LIEUTENANT OLIVER, JEFF MEASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. BISHOP et al.
as 1:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
ZERRIUS K. BOYD, SR.
Defendant:
WARDEN MARK BISHOP, MICHAEL SCANNELL, MARCY PERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
HAPPEL v. VENANGO COUNTY PRISON et al
as 1:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HAPPEL
Defendant:
VENANGO COUNTY PRISON, MARK BISHOP, UPMC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
GRIFFIN v. UPMC PRESBYTERIAN et al
as 2:2022cv01795
Plaintiff:
JAMAAL R. GRIFFIN
Defendant:
UPMC PRESBYTERIAN, UPMC POLICE SECURITY SERVICES, SWISSVALE P.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MALARIK et al v. BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2021cv00779
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYONS, SR., ERNEST POOH THORTON, JAMES M. WHITEY BULGE MALARICK and others
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY DETECTIVE BUREAU GOON SQUAD, BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION, BEAVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
O'Donnell v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00136
Defendant:
Renee Shrimp, 10 A/POC CO's, Jane/John Doe(s) Psychologists and others
Plaintiff:
Kelley O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARTLE v. UPMC NORTHWEST et al
as 1:2019cv00087
Defendant:
UPMC NORTHWEST, SCI ALBION, OIL CITY POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG LEE HARTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
