Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12365
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lucas v. Garland et al
as 1:2021cv00178
Defendant:
Edward Blanchette, Wing Chau, Daniel W. Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jaye v. United States et al
as 1:2021cv00169
Defendant:
United States, US Attorney General Merrick Brian Garland, County of Union and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Ann Jaye
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Young v. United States Department Of Justice et al
as 1:2021cv10226
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
US Attorney General and United States Department Of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Strafford County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al
as 1:2021cv00026
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, RRC Director, Bureau of Prisons, US Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
Roy Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv10958
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and US Attorney General William Barr
Petitioner:
Fredrick C. Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv10274
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Lewis v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2019cv10821
Defendant:
Consolidated Legal Center, Cynthia Young, US Attorney General William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
