Cases 31 - 40 of 82
U.S. AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION v. US AIRWAYS, INC
as 2:2013cv00627
Plaintiff:
U.S. AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS, INC
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
PEDRICK et al v. US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.
as 2:2013cv01211
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PEDRICK and KATHLEEN PEDRICK
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WILCHOMBE v. US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05847
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WILCHOMBE
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. and US AIRWAYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash
ADAMS et al v. US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05603
Plaintiff:
SHARNAE ADAMS , BEVERLY ADAMS , TAMEKA ADAMS and others
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. and US AIRWAYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SPAULDING et al v. AIR WISCONSIN AIRLINES CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv03644
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. SPAULDING and CHERYL A. SPAULDING
Defendant:
AIR WISCONSIN AIRLINES CORPORATION and US AIRWAYS GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
