Cases 31 - 40 of 194
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv03063
Defendant:
District Director USCIS - Houston District Office, USCIS Office of the Chief Counsel, USCIS Texas Service Center and others
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Garza v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00989
Plaintiff:
Raymond Garza
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and US Attorney General
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00802
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Guerrero-Vaco v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Amanda Sierra Guerrero-Vaco
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, US Attorney General, Social Security of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region VI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Osorio v. US Attorney General
as 4:2021cv00844
Respondent:
US Attorney General
Petitioner:
Gabino Medina Osorio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garza v. Blinken et al
as 7:2021cv00070
Plaintiff:
Damaris Giselle Garza
Defendant:
Secretary Antony J. Blinken, U.S. Department of State, US Attorney General Merrick B Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
