Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv02163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gayden v. Clements et al
as 5:2022cv00171
Petitioner:
M.D. John Matthew Gayden, Jr. and John Matthew Gayden, Jr.
Defendant:
Stephen Clements and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Raghubir v. United States of America et al
as 6:2021cv01714
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Florida, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Raghubir v. United States of America et al
as 6:2021cv01655
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Florida, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Raghubir v. United States of America et al
as 6:2021cv01617
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Florida, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raghubir v. United States of America et al
as 6:2021cv01564
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Florida, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raghubir v. United States of America, et al.
as 6:2021cv00616
Respondent:
US District Courts 11th Circuit, US Supreme Court, FDLE and others
Petitioner:
Vinodh Raghubir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
