Cases 1 - 10 of 21
SMITH v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2022cv00411
Plaintiff:
TYRONE L SMITH
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, US Attorney General MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHASE v. PELOSI et al
as 3:2022cv17729
Plaintiff:
LINDA CHASE
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI, US Attorney General MERRICK GARLAND, JASON COODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHASE v. KIJAKAZI et al
as 5:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
LINDA CHASE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, DAVID HERMANN, US Attorney General MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LAMM v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
DEVIN ERIC LAMM
Defendant:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS-VEASEY v. GARLAND et al
as 5:2021cv00172
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN MORRIS-VEASEY
Defendant:
US Attorney General MERRICK GARLAND, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
RAGHUBIR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv00061
Respondent:
US DISTRICT COURTS 11TH CIRCUIT, US SUPREME COURT, FDLE and others
Petitioner:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RAGHUBIR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2020cv00282
Respondent:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, US DISTRICT COURTS 11TH CIRCUIT, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT and others
Petitioner:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RAGHUBIR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2020cv00203
Respondent:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 9TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, US COURT OF APPEALS 11TH CIRCUIT and others
Petitioner:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
