Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02942
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PETRUCELLI v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS et al
as 1:2022cv02281
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. PETRUCELLI
Not Classified By Court:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS and OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
WATTS et al v. WATTS et al
as 1:2021cv01595
Defendant:
DANIEL SHUE, CHRISTOPHER BARRICK, KRISTOPHER KOELEMAY and others
Plaintiff:
LINDSAY LOPEZ and EDWARD ALLAN WATTS
Debtor In Possession:
RAGER H. MOORE, II
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
DOWNEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv02309
Defendant:
NATIONAL DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL ASSN., LOCKHEED MARTIN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
MARK DOWNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consuelo Jordan v. US Attorney's Office for DC
as 13-5029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Consuelo Jordan
Defendant - Appellee:
US Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HAWKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01939
Plaintiff:
LEVI MCRAE LUGINBYHL HAWKINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CLAIRE V. EAGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLBERT v. US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
as 1:2010cv01402
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO COLBERT
Defendant:
US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
