Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Dillard v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Jonathan F Dillard
Defendant:
United States, US Marshals, Deborah Gresham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dillard v. United States of America, et al.
as 1:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jonathan F. Dillard
Defendant:
United States of America, US Marshals, Kassandra McGrady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01830
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Person v. Mason County Human Resources/Risk Managment et al
as 3:2022cv05763
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shrone Person
Defendant:
Mason County Human Resources/Risk Managment, Shelton Police Department, Thurston County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vilaychith Khouanmany v. US Marshal Service, et al
as 22-16511
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY
Defendant / Appellee:
US MARSHAL SERVICE, SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ALENCASTRE and others
Robert Dillon v. Luis Rosa, et al
as 22-16031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT J. DILLON
Defendant / Appellee:
LUIS ROSA, substituted in for Brian Koehn [53], MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director, M. JEFFERSON, US Marshal Service and others
Murphy v. US Marshals Services et al
as 6:2020cv00898
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Defendant:
US Marshals Services, B.O.P. and Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaxiola v. US Marshal's
as 3:2020cv00279
Petitioner:
Hector Manuel Gaxiola
Respondent:
US Marshal's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schuett v. US Marshals
as 2:2020cv00212
Respondent:
US Marshals
Petitioner:
Clifford Schuett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Poulson v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2019cv01091
Respondent:
Captain Wheeler, US. Marshalls and U.S. Gov't
Petitioner:
K. Ty Poulson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
