Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Shayesteh v. Hoye et al
as 2:2020cv00051
Defendant:
Christopher Hoye, Deputy US Marshal for the District of Utah, Kenneth Runde and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmad R. Shayesteh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansoori v. Two Unknown Named Deputy US Marshals et al
as 5:2017cv00714
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Mansoori
Defendant:
Two Unknown Named Deputy US Marshals and Director of Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz-Barajas v. US Marshal Service et al
as 1:2016cv00026
Petitioner:
Edgar Neftali Ruiz-Barajas
Respondent:
US Marshal Service and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Stephens et al
as 5:2014cv01362
Plaintiff:
Maurice Morlee Johnson
Defendant:
Richard Stephens, Logan County Jail, Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacquet v. Weir et al
as 5:2014cv01332
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Bacquet
Respondent:
J Weir and US Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Grady County Jail et al
as 5:2013cv01103
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Banks
Defendant:
Grady County Jail and US Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Warden of the Federal Transfer Center et al
as 5:2013cv00193
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Warden of the Federal Transfer Center, Pam Butler, Drew Scarsborough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wilson v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2012cv01131
Plaintiff:
David Wilson
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Oklahoma City City of, Oklahoma County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. US Marshals Office
as 5:2012cv01059
Plaintiff:
David Wilson
Defendant:
US Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kanno v. Three Unknown US Marshal
as 11-6187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY E. KANNO
Defendant - Appellee:
THREE UNKNOWN US MARSHALS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
