Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Soto-Santini v. United States Marshals
as 23-1346
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEANNETTE SOTO-SANTINI
Defendant / Appellee:
US MARSHALS SERVICE
US v. Cruz-Quilan
as 23-1253
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE R. CRUZ-QUILAN
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO, US MARSHALS SERVICE and US PRETRIAL SERVICES
Sinkfield v. Grondolsky, et al
as 21-1527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURICE J. SINKFIELD
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY GRONDOLSKY and NELSON ELIAS
Defendant:
US MARSHALS SERVICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and FMC DEVENS
Silva v. Smith, et al
as 21-1320
Defendant / Appellee:
C. J. WYATT, in is Individual and Official Capacity as a U.S. Marshal Supervisor, JOHN F. MCBURNEY, III, in his Individual and Official Capacity as a RI State Magistrate Judge, US MARSHALS DANGEROUS FUGITIVES TASK FORCE, in their Individual and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD J. SILVA
Warner v. US
as 20-1765
Defendant:
FEDERAL TRANSFER CENTER, Oklahoma City, US MARSHALS SERVICE, Grady County Law Enforcement Center, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUKE JOSEPH WARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
In Re: Armando Pon
as 14-2102
Petitioner:
ARMANDO PONS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE and others
In re: Wattleton, et al
as 13-1297
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons and T. MARSHAL, Director US Marshal Service
In Re: Crooker
as 1:2010mc00162
Petitioner:
Michael Crooker
Defendant:
Brian K. Murphy, US Marshal and Donald W. Wyatt Detention Facility
Boulanger v. US Marshal Service, New Hampshire District, Director et al
as 1:2007mc00023
Plaintiff:
Gerard Boulanger
Defendant:
US Marshal Service, New Hampshire District, Director, Linda Lee, Donna Roy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
