Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Barrett v. Kelly et al
as 4:2019cv00487
Defendant:
Kelly, Bell, Glenn and others
Plaintiff:
William Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradin v. US Marshals Service et al
as 6:2018cv03402
Defendant:
US Marshals Service Subcontractors, US Marshals Service Contractors and US Marshals Service
Plaintiff:
John Bradin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. US Marshals Service
as 4:2017cv00935
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Robinson
Respondent:
US Marshals Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 4:2017cv00418
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes, US Marshals Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. US Marshals Service
as 4:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
Maurice A Johnson
Defendant:
US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Lyons v. Sanders et al
as 6:2016cv03074
Plaintiff:
Deon Lorenzo Lyons
Defendant:
Linda Sanders, J Grondolsky, FMC Devens Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hunter v. Herrington et al
as 6:2014cv03366
Petitioner:
Michael Hunter
Respondent:
Ron Herrington, US Marshals Service and Linda Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stine v. US Marshal Justice Prisoner Air Transport Division et al
as 6:2014cv03351
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
US Marshal Justice Prisoner Air Transport Division, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Woolridge v. US Marshals Service et al
as 4:2014cv00243
Plaintiff:
Joshua Todd Woolridge
Defendant:
US Marshals Service and Bryan H. Cutter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilmore v. Keeler et al
as 4:2013cv01148
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Gilmore
Defendant:
Scott Keeler, Sammy Bowden and US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
