Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01830
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Batchelor v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
Demetrus Batchelor
Defendant:
City of Portland, Department of Homeland Security, US Marshals Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Murphy v. US Marshals Services et al
as 6:2020cv00898
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Defendant:
US Marshals Services, B.O.P. and Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poulson v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2019cv01091
Respondent:
Captain Wheeler, US. Marshalls and U.S. Gov't
Petitioner:
K. Ty Poulson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Giffen v. FBI et al
as 3:2018cv02225
Defendant:
Kimberly Seymour, US Marshalls, Todd Bofferding and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Giffen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giffen v. FBI et al
as 3:2018cv02215
Respondent:
Kimberly Seymour, Judge Mustafa Kasubhai, Todd Bofferding and others
Petitioner:
Todd Giffen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stoltenberg v. Sheridan FCI et al
as 3:2015cv02231
Defendant:
B.O.P., Sheridan FCI, US Dept. of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Stoltenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2013cv01097
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Clerks, Federal Parole & Probation and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Joseph Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. USBANCORP-USBANK-GMAC-MERS et al
as 3:2012cv00199
Defendant:
John V. Acosta, Sam Adams, Ann L. Aiken and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Chapin v. Durr et al
as 6:2008cv00883
Plaintiff:
Reynold Sare Chapin
Defendant:
F. Durr, Massie, United States Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
