Cases 1 - 10 of 962
THATCHER v. USA
as 2:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
MATTHEW THATCHER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PERRY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
DAMIAN PERRY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
NEWREZ LLC v. MORNEAU
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
NEWREZ LLC doing business as SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING
Defendant:
CLIFFORD R MORNEAU
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNIVERSITY CREDIT UNION, SCARLETT DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
PAWLENDZIO v. HOME DEPOT USA INC
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
FRANK J PAWLENDZIO
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PARKER v. USA
as 2:2023cv00443
Petitioner:
JULION PARKER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
ADAMSON v. USA
as 2:2023cv00425
Petitioner:
CHET ADAMSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ALTENBURG v. USA
as 2:2023cv00398
Petitioner:
DAVID ALTENBURG
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PAIGE v. USA
as 2:2023cv00393
Petitioner:
TRAVIS PAIGE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. CRYPTOCURRENCY SEIZED FROM ACCOUNT OF CHANDNI SHARMA et al
as 2:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
CRYPTOCURRENCY SEIZED FROM ACCOUNT OF CHANDNI SHARMA, CRYPTOCURRENCY SEIZED FROM ACCOUNT OF ANUJ SHARMA and CRYPTOCURRENCY SEIZED FROM ACCOUNT OF KUNAL CHHABRA DILIP KUMAR CHHABRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
