Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Martin Nothstein v. USA Cycling
as 20-3364
Defendant / Appellee:
USA CYCLING
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN W. NOTHSTEIN
NOTHSTEIN v. USA CYCLING
as 5:2019cv01631
Defendant:
USA CYCLING
Plaintiff:
MARTIN W. NOTHSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nova Casualty Company v. Lexington Insurance Company et al
as 1:2018cv00844
Plaintiff:
Nova Casualty Company
Defendant:
Lexington Insurance Company and USA Cycling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finken v. USA Cycling
as 1:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Gerald Finken
Defendant:
USA Cycling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. ESTATE OF COLE R. PORTER et al
as 3:2014cv06465
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ESTATE OF COLE R. PORTER , MEGAN PORTER, FAYE PORTER and others
Counter_claimant:
CIRCLE MOTORSPORT, INC.
Counter_defendant:
USA CYCLING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Lucero v. Heagerty, III et al
as 1:2014cv00473
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lucero
Defendant:
George Heagerty, III and USA Cycling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gricelda Gamboa et al v. U S A Cycling Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00598
Plaintiff:
Gricelda Gamboa and Oscar Gamboa
Defendant:
MLO Enterprises LLC, Michael L Olsen, U S A Cycling Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Gricelda Gamboa et al v. U S A Cycling Inc et al
as 2:2012cv10051
Defendant:
Does, MLO Enterprises LLC, Michael L Olsen and others
Plaintiff:
Gricelda Gamboa and Oscar Gamboa
Levy v. Worthington et al
as 1:2011cv00978
Plaintiff:
Eliane Levy
Defendant:
Clayton Downey Worthington, Progressive Overload, LLC, Mark Tyson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collins et al v. USA Cycling et al
as 2:2010cv00379
Plaintiff:
David Collins , Ruth Collins , J. Steven Beck and others
Defendant:
USA Cycling , Greg L. Rasmussen and David W. Christiansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
