Cases 1 - 10 of 207
Eliel Mata-Arrevalo v. USP Atlanta Warden
as 23-14230
Petitioner:
ELIEL MATA-ARREVALO
Respondent:
USP ATLANTA WARDEN and FCI JESUP WARDEN
Arroyo-Maldonado v. Warden, USP Atlanta
as 1:2023cv04585
Petitioner:
Jose Arroyo-Maldonado
Respondent:
Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Castro v. Warden, USP Atlanta
as 1:2023cv02228
Petitioner:
John Caisedo Castro
Respondent:
Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Arrechavaleta v. Salem et al
as 1:2023cv02080
Petitioner:
Pablo Arrechavaleta
Respondent:
Warden S. Salem, Warden S. Jenkins, USP Atlanta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reginald Myers v. Warden, USP Atlanta
as 23-5138
Petitioner / Appellant:
REGINALD S. MYERS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, USP ATLANTA
Joe Russell, Jr. v. USP Atlanta Warden
as 23-10330
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOE B. RUSSELL, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
USP ATLANTA WARDEN
Black v. Corvajal et al
as 1:2022cv04870
Plaintiff:
Randy Lamar Black
Defendant:
B.O.P. Director Michael Corvajal, Unknown Directors, Unknown USP Atlanta Wardens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Cassaday v. USP Atlanta et al
as 1:2022cv04589
Petitioner:
Kevin W. Cassaday
Respondent:
USP Atlanta and Warden John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Tibaduiza Olarte v. USP Atlanta
as 3:2022cv00170
Petitioner:
Daniel Camilo Tibaduiza Olarte
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone and Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
