Cases 91 - 100 of 105
Nathan Smith v. J.C. Holland, et al
as 13-5847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
J.C. HOLLAND, USP McCreary, CHARLES SAMUELS, Director, BOP, TAMYRA JARVIS, Warden and others
Lewis v. Federal Bureau Prisons et al
as 6:2013cv00101
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lester Lewis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Castro v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2013cv00059
Plaintiff:
Louis Castro
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, FBOP and USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gilmore v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Errick Gilmore
Defendant:
USP McCreary, J.C. Holland, Maruka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Denton v. Warden of USP McCreary
as 6:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
Ricky Walter Denton
Defendant:
Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sykes v. Quay et al
as 6:2011cv00303
Plaintiff:
Overtis Sykes
Defendant:
H. Quay, Sheila R. Mattingly, Federal Burea of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thrower v. USA et al
as 6:2011cv00285
Plaintiff:
William Thrower
Defendant:
USA, Bureau of Prisons and Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Edward Spearman v. Eric Wilson, et al
as 11-5952
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD OMAR SPEARMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC D. WILSON, Warden, Former Warden USP-McCreary and RICHARD IVES, Warden USP-McCreary
Patrick Jones v. M. Daniels, et al
as 10-6408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK A. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
M. DANIELS, KITCHENS, T. DOOLIN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
